Cloud computing is a great benefit and is essential for healthcare systems. The primary reason why healthcare systems require cloud computing is that it is flexible. For example, when an organization runs out of storage, its public cloud will scale it up to provide seamless services.
But cloud-agnostic is a step ahead because it can run applications and workload within public clouds; no specific cloud required.
If healthcare organizations use cloud-agnostic, it doesn’t mean that the organization works differently to different cloud providers. Without a doubt, healthcare organizations would have preferences related to their cloud setup. They will consider the price, offerings and many more factors when establishing a cloud setup.
So cloud-agnostic defines the organization’s pre-planning. Healthcare organizations should be able to switch tracks when it is needed. Therefore, it can only be done by cloud-agnostic, even without facing major disruptions or hiccups to the healthcare system.
Is Cloud Agnostic Architecture a Myth or a Truth?
When talking about cloud-agnosticism, it’s often questioned whether it is a myth or a truth. Well, it is not a myth but some developers believe it can’t be achieved. So in terms of conventions it is treated as a myth.
Actually, the containerization technology may sound helpful as it can decrease friction when moving from one provider to another cloud provider. It can also be managed accordingly, but the problem arises with vendor lock-in. When considering a way to avoid vendor lock-in, it’s impossible to rely on containerization. This is why many organizations prefer cloud-agnostic.
The next argument about myth or truth is related to Terraform. By using Terraform it is possible to spine up the system, but this does not apply to the healthcare industry. Writing numerous Terraform scripts for providers might sound absurd when we consider the size of the healthcare organization. It’s a lot of work because it is essential to have some insights about the underlying platform.
Anyway, for the healthcare industry cloud-agnostic architecture is essential when considering its size. Though some developers might still consider it a myth, it is not necessarily a myth.
Then, why are businesses still debating on cloud-native vs. cloud agnostic? Let’s see!
Heated debate on Cloud-Native vs. Cloud- Agnostic
While organizations are considering cloud solutions, a heated debate gets in the way. They are confused if they should select cloud-agnostic or cloud-native. Well, both approaches have their own benefits and drawbacks. Therefore, it is essential to dig deeper into both approaches separately before making a decision.
Cloud-native means your organization surrender’s to the platform. In other words, the application will utilize the benefits of the underlying platform without being in the cloud.
However, cloud-native services have excellent performance, lower costs and efficiency. Features offered by Google and Amazon can be loaded and auto-scaled by cloud-native.
With cloud-native it is possible to use native APIs, but the downside is when the requirement arises to move to another cloud provider. Then, it becomes a necessity to rewrite code. All the steps that tag along with code rewriting requires a lot of time and money. So, this pretty much covers cloud-native.
Cloud-agnostic will not have a lot of impact on business processes or IT systems when moving from one cloud to another. In technical terms, the application is platform-agnostic and the data is portable. Standard performance and consistency in all the environments are the benefits of cloud-agnostic services.
But the downside would be the complexities and cost when moving from one provider to another. Sometimes there can be issues in performance if the vendors have different internal designs.
So deciding whether to select cloud-agnostic or cloud-native is up to the organization. Even though portability is a problem with the cloud-native approach, there are other benefits that organizations might like. But cloud-agnostic has effortless ways to transfer from one cloud to another. However, the decision should be made by considering the type of organization, budget, time and many other factors. So when considering the healthcare system, it is pretty much clear that cloud-agnostic is the choice. So, let’s see how cloud-agnostic can reduce risks in healthcare.
Cloud-Agnostic to reduce risks in Healthcare
By preferring the agnostic approach, both money and time can be saved along with an excellent level of flexibility in management. The organization needs to invest in order to transform into cloud-agnostic. The ability to migrate to different cloud providers is a great opportunity when the organization deals with vendor issues, failures or prefer to expand the organization.
Now is the time to stop worrying about code legacy and focus on the ultimate result so that the decision becomes clear and firm. Some of the general rules that you need to know when using flexible engineering architectures are:
By following these rules, it is easy to create healthy development practices in the evolving business world. However, your decision in regards to cloud providers should be well-considered. Many factors impact this decision, hence, be mindful.
There are both risks and benefits in cloud-agnostic architecture and hence, only by seeking help from an established company, healthcare organizations can move forward. At CSI, we don’t boast about the things that we can’t do but when it comes to cloud-agnostic, we can show colors to make it work excellently even though it is foreign to many companies out there.